EBS

Exclusive: Q1 2014 US FX Account Profitability Report, Less Traders but More Profits

US retail forex brokers have issued their figures of client profitability and active account numbers for Q1 2014. During the quarter, 37.6% of traders were profitable, a 4.1% increase from Q4 2013.
4 Comments

(Final results updated)

US retail Forex brokers have issued their figures of client profitability and active account numbers of non-discretionary accounts for Q1 2014. During the quarter, 37.6% of traders were profitable, a 4.1% increase from Q4 2013. The advancements in client performance occurred across the board, with Interactive Brokers being the sole broker to report its Forex customers having experienced a decline in profitability.

US Q1 2014 Forex Profitability and Active Account Report

US Q1 2014 Forex Profitability and Active Account Report

The more positive climate in trading though did little to help brokers expand their customer numbers, as the amount of non-discretionary traders placing trades during the quarter contracted by 1.8% to 94,869. The figures represent a multi-year of active retail Forex traders in the US. Some would consider this not surprising given restrictions that have been placed on brokers in the country causing the exodus of numerous firms such as GFT and Alpari. In addition to brokers, increases in regulatory reporting and fees have also made it more difficult for introducing brokers to actively market their services in the US, which in turn reduce marketing efforts to new forex customers in the country.

Active US Forex Non-Discretionary Accounts

Active US Forex Non-Discretionary Accounts

Among individual performers, Interactive Brokers (IB) once again took the top spot among major brokers as it had the highest amount of active traders as well as accounts being the most profitable. However, unlike previous quarters when IB outperformed other firms in account growth, its lead was cut in Q1, as active trader numbers declined by 3.6%.

Closing the gap to IB was FXCM and OANDA. With its slight gain of 95 accounts, OANDA registered the largest gain in active customers, as its total US non-discretionary traders grew to 20,341. OANDA’s traders also rebounded in terms of profitability, as 42.2% of account holders registered gains, versus 32.5% in Q4 2013. The Q4 2013 marked a multi-year low at OANDA, which representatives of the firm attributed to unique market conditions which affected their US customers adversely. Also rebounding was FXCM where profitability of US clients rose to 33% after being below the 30% market throughout 2012. However, like the majority of brokers, US client levels at FXCM contracted by 2.0% to 22,226.

Also of note, before deciding to exit the US market, ILQ ended Q1 2014 with 921 clients, 3.9% below the previous quarter. The exit of ILQ and its client base could cause further contraction of overall US active trader numbers during Q2.

(Author’s note: CitiFX figures are based on Q4 2013 results as the firm has yet to update their Q1 2014 figures. Due to Citi’s minor impact on overall averages, we went ahead with publishing the report before they filed and will update results accordingly)

Previous Reports: Q4 2013Q3 2013Q2 2013, Q1 2013, Q4 2012, Q3 2012, Q2 2012, Q1 2012


Sucden






TAGS: , , , , ,
 
More information on this subject is found in the latest Forex Magnates Quarterly Report


4 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Retail Chump said:

    IB – Lowest costs & best product offering on this list (so not surprisingly has the most profitable clients). On the downside, a horrible platform, which puts many people off.
    Oanda – At a multi year low because retail chumps dislike: its increased spreads (Oanda was more competitive a few years ago), and several platform stability issues in 2013. To be fair, Oanda have addressed some of these issues – but not all.
    FXCM – Way too expensive (very wide spreads) & not impressed with their execution. They’re quite good on marketing though (and more popular in the US which has less choice of fx brokers) – which I guess explains some of their client growth.

    Overall, retail fx brokers still suck. If the institutional world opened up to the retail base, they would take all this flow & clean up. Total (hedged & unhedged) retail flow is circa 6% of the spot market, forecast to be 20% in a few years. The first mover will take (and likely keep) it all.

    May 1st, 2014 at 12:22 am
  2. Michael Greenberg said:

    what do you think of the likes of LMAX as a rather institutional attempt at retail fx?

    May 1st, 2014 at 12:40 am
  3. Retail Chump said:

    LMAX are fantastic – quite simply the best fx ‘broker’ available to the smaller capitalised trader. Love the MTF concept, and their platform stability, execution etc are superb. (Disclaimer – I am an LMAX customer).

    May 1st, 2014 at 12:56 am
  4. Andy said:

    Agreed about lmax. Its probably the best sort of market access an individual can get at the moment, and it even has very low minimums compared to their direct competitors.

    May 1st, 2014 at 1:46 am

We do not store your information and we do not disclose our sources.


Leave your name/email (not required) if you'd like to be contacted about this story (will not be disclosed):



Note: Copyright © 2014 Forex Magnates. All rights reserved.

All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of Forex Magnates. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer. Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you.Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at Forex Magnates are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Forex Magnates or its management. Forex Magnates has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by Forex Magnates, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. Forex Magnates will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2014 "Forex Magnates Inc. - Home of the Forex Elite" All Rights Reserved.