F for Forex, F for Finland – a discussion with FinFX

36 Comments

The world of Forex has been finding its place in every part of the globe, each country can boast at least one Forex trader and now brokers are propping up from all over. FinFX an FX broker based in Finland seems to be pushing the right buttons as they have been successfully positioning themselves as an alternative for FX and in particular EA trading.

Forexmagnates’ team discussed the firm, its history and what their secret ingredient is with CEO Jani Hjerppe.

Please provide a background to the firm.

I founded FinFX in 2010, I have been involved in the FX markets since the last seven years as a professional trader. Having worked with wide range of brokers I felt that there was a gap for traders from Finland to understand and enter the FX markets.

I created a business plan, met investors and here we have FinFX.

What is your Business model?

As I have been a trader with both market makers and ECN brokers I felt obliged to offer Forex traders the best conditions in the market, it gives us confidence that from the outset we are provident a clear, transparent and efficient service to our clients.

We have teamed up with a leading software provider that provides a interbank bridge to our MT4, it aggregates liquidity form the largest bank and ECNS and pools them out to our clients.

Is your firm regulated?

The current laws in Finland do not regulate FX as an asset class, however we as a firm are working on standards which include strong KYC, AML procedures and monitoring and most importantly full segregation of client money. The company funds and client funds are kept completely separated.

What are your unique selling points in this competitive market?

Our entry into the market was to provide a high level of service to clients from Finland however we have received a tremendous response from the global trader community and our core values of fast, timely and efficient customer service is paying off.

Who is your typical client?

We welcome traders who are looking for a professional and transparent service without restrictions and limitations. We have experienced a rise in automated traders from across the globe including Europe, USA, Asia and Japan. Most of the traders use Expert Advisors, we don’t put pressure on the trader in terms of length of trade or strategies like scalping, and all are welcome.

What kind of growth have you experienced and what are the client numbers and volumes?

The growth has been fantastic, from a handful of clients in the first few months we now have around 10,000 clients.

Trading and running a company are two complete different things, how have you found setting up and managing the company?

It has been an uphill struggle and continues to, I have faced many sleepless nights, rejections and dismay however I have been committed to my business objectives and have great plans for FinFX.

This leads me on to my final question, what can we expect from FinFX in the future?

We are developing our service and instrument range to include CFD’s, and other products. Keeping professional skills of our staff up to date. We choose our goal to be the Broker no 1 for all traders in the world.

Jani will be following the post and will be delighted to respond to any comments.

We would like to show our thanks to Jani and his team and wish them success in the future.

 

Click here to access your latest copy of the Forex Magnates Retail Forex Industry Report.

TAGS: , , , , , , , , , ,
 
More information on this subject is found in the latest Forex Magnates Quarterly Report

TradoLogic

36 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Andy said:

    How is it possible to not be regulated as a financial service provider with in the EU? Did Finland not completely implement the MIFID directive? Is it legal to provide financial sercices to EU residents without a mifid passport?

    Segregation without regulation means nothing – clients will still be unsecured creditors in the case of a bankruptcy.

    December 1st, 2011 at 7:21 pm
  2. Michael Greenberg said:

    good question. Adil – can you get FinFX guys to answer that?

    December 1st, 2011 at 7:49 pm
  3. Jani Hjerppe said:

    Dear Andy,

    Thank you for your question.

    We understand your concerns about safety issues and we would like to provide you some information.

    It’s true that Finnish FSA does not regulate Forex as it is not considered as financial instrument in Finland. You can verify this information by contacting Finnish FSA. Despite the fact Forex is not a subject of regulation in Finland, FinFX has to follow number of strict Finnish laws.

    Your statement “Segregation without regulation means nothing – clients will be still unsecured creditors in case of bankruptcy” is incorrect, and I would like to clarify why.

    FinFX ensures its reliability and secure clients funds. Clients’ funds are handled completely separately from the company assets. Funds are segregated. It means that clients’ funds are not reflected in the corporate financial statement. FinFX uses PriceWaterHouseCoopers for the annual auditing that will confirm client funds are never used to cover company’s running daily expenses.

    FinFX will shortly publish a statement from PWC that will ensure clients’ funds to be fully segregated. If FinFX goes bankruptcy, all our clients will get their money back as they remain the owners of the funds in segregated accounts.

    Best Regards
    Jani Hjerppe

    December 2nd, 2011 at 7:57 am
  4. Matthew Bennett said:

    Hello Mr. Hjerppe,

    As there isn’t a real market for CFDs, how will FinFX handle the client’s trade for those products? Will you trade against customers when they open a CFD trade?

    Thank you.

    Regards,
    Matthew

    December 2nd, 2011 at 9:27 am
  5. James said:

    Jani Hjerppe

    How do you anticipate on defending your firm’s position on blatantly accepting US customers when it is illegal for US clients to trade with non registered RFED’s.

    I would assume half of your client base is US based as a result of unregistered IB’s, at some point the CFTC will be in contact with the “strict Finnish FSA” regulatory body that does not even recognize FX as a financial instrument…

    Publishing segration is one thing, having a regulatory body confirm it is another.

    December 2nd, 2011 at 11:49 am
  6. Robert said:

    oh man!!!!!! this guy put too much information about his clients base…this interview might cost him business ….CFTC is about to call u my friend. or band your site for us clients.

    lesson: giving interview is not always a good thing.

    December 2nd, 2011 at 1:45 pm
  7. Michael Greenberg said:

    i don’t think his firm has anything to do with CFTC – it’s Finnish, not American and he didn’t say anything about American clients either

    December 2nd, 2011 at 2:05 pm
  8. Michael Greenberg said:

    where did you read about his US clients?

    December 2nd, 2011 at 2:06 pm
  9. Mark said:

    I can’t tell for sure, however I have seen traders stating on the internet this broker accept us clients. However the owner can reply to this community and clarify.
    Michael G., the CFTC will file lawsuite regardless the country the broker operates like it has already done with others.

    As far as the “segregation” debate, I am more concerned about the owners statements above because they show he barely understand the concept of segregation, or he is just ‘playing’ with the term.

    you keep funds in a separate bank account. And thank you for sharing that with us, however pls tell me who do you report such segregation, and who prohibits you from taking a sip out of such funds. More important, when you will go belly up, how customer funds will be used to cover your debits….. Or the day the CFCT will sue you badly and ask for compensatory and damage like they did with Jadefx, please tell me where they will take these money from.

    Other have been walking before you the avenue of the non-regulation, and maybe some with the best intentions. However as things turns bad and the ship is sinking, most of them run away with
    money promise and nice articles. Segregation is not just a willing from a broker, but an obligation to maintain and REPORT such funds. Let’s not mislead traders with these statements.

    My final consideration goes to our regulators. This is an example of the over-relues you have created. On one side brokers that get fined, stressed, harassed for “misleading promotional material” because they forgot to add the hundreds of crap disclosures, on the other side we have fully unregulated brokers which might claim the moon. Would you blame a US trader for going with such unregulated brokers?

    December 3rd, 2011 at 1:53 pm
  10. A. said:

    @Michael Greenberg:

    “We have experienced a rise in automated traders from across the globe including Europe, USA, Asia and Japan.”

    Either illegal, or marketing bullshit boilerplate.

    December 3rd, 2011 at 2:59 pm
  11. Michael Greenberg said:

    if that’s the case then CFTC will hunt him down just like rest of those firms

    December 3rd, 2011 at 5:26 pm
  12. Michael Greenberg said:

    heh, i missed that

    December 3rd, 2011 at 5:26 pm
  13. Andy said:

    Its my understanding while the CFTC tries to enforce its rules in an extra-territorial fashion, its only reasonably possible to do so for them if finfx would have a presence in the USA in one way or another (i.e. bank accounts). Traveling to the states might prove risky tho..

    December 3rd, 2011 at 7:11 pm
  14. Matt said:

    Guys, get with reality.
    This is a finnish company, CFTC have absolutely no jurisdictional rights here at all. Where they file a lawsuit, in USA? What heck good would that do.
    CFTC has to get over it, they cant make the rules for every country in the world. USA mentality,think they can impose their laws on other countries.
    Non-USA brokers who will accept USA clients will happen over and over again. Pick one of another 300 countries to open the brokerage. End of story.

    December 4th, 2011 at 7:44 am
  15. Michael Greenberg said:

    yep, CFTC tries to enforce American laws over foreign companies which is ridiculous but doesn’t stop them from trying…

    December 4th, 2011 at 11:59 am
  16. Jim Hunt said:

    Hi Michael,

    My comment last week about the CFTC and MF Global seems to have vanished. I was idly wondering where it went, and why?

    Cheers,

    Jim

    December 5th, 2011 at 9:26 am
  17. Jani Hjerppe said:

    Dear Mark,
    Thank you for your comment.

    Please understand world-wide known auditing company PWC is a reliable source to prove FinFX is following its legal obligations. Upon our request, auditors will issue a statement that will confirm our company does not mix corporate assets with the client funds and we are willing to provide this document.

    Following the discussion, I would like to remind FinFX is a Finland-based company that has to comply with Finnish legislation only.

    December 5th, 2011 at 9:48 am
  18. Pat said:

    Hello Hjerpe, Michael,
    Going by the new Wall Street Reform regulations now imposed on US FX traders, are we to believe that FinFX’s US clients are all $1 million plus ECPs trading on a simple MT4 platform? Personally I find this a little hard to believe.

    December 5th, 2011 at 10:14 am
  19. Michael Greenberg said:

    just didn’t see added value in it except external linking

    December 5th, 2011 at 12:03 pm
  20. Michael Greenberg said:

    i think reading between the lines his statement is quite obvious… and anyone standing up to cftc/nfa monopoly gets my vote :)

    December 5th, 2011 at 12:04 pm
  21. Carsten said:

    I have reviewed the interview and comments and would like to add some important facts. First, it seems like every broker out there now claims they “segregate client funds”. True segregation does not mean that client funds are placed into a separate bank account. Each trader must have their own individual account within a custodian of funds separate from a firms company funds. The fact that Jani references PWC as “a reliable source” is laughable. Any company can make that claim. Have we already forgotten about JadeFX? Only firms that belong to a regulatory body that requires and monitors segregation of client funds should be trusted.

    The rules concerning the acceptance of U.S. clients are very straight forward and simple. Any forex firm who accepts clients who reside in or are domiciled in the United States and are not ECP eligible, will be subject to all NFA and CFTC rules and guidelines. It does not matter where the company is located or what, if any, regulatory body the company is subject too. The fact that your company is not regulated and there is not even a regulatory body that recognizes FX in Finland means you do not follow any legislation. This will not protect you from the arms of the CFTC.

    I must say that it is quite concerning to see a CEO of a Forex firm so misinformed or even worse, misrepresenting such important topics in such a widely viewed forum.

    December 5th, 2011 at 2:19 pm
  22. Michael Greenberg said:

    do you really think americans should enforce their rules on foreign firms? where does this end? they’ll make british drive on the right side of the road?

    December 5th, 2011 at 2:27 pm
  23. James said:

    Greenberg, didnt you recently post how India is cracking down on Forex investments.

    The US is not the only regulatory body which restricts is citizens from participating with brokerages who are not members of there regulatory entities.

    FSA Japan enforced 50-1 leverage, B.C. Canada, India, Colombia, are a few that come to mind, and yes the US as well.

    December 5th, 2011 at 2:41 pm
  24. Jim Hunt said:

    Hi Michael,

    Oh no they wont! Haven’t you ever watched “Love Actually”?

    Re the link you seem to disapprove of, I felt my article added a variety of useful information over and above anything available @ForexMagnates on the topic, not least of which was the British perspective.

    Cheers,

    Jim

    December 5th, 2011 at 2:42 pm
  25. Michael Greenberg said:

    really? you call me by last name? do we know?
    yes they all published rules but they only chase those that break these rules on their soil, not outside of it – which only CFTC does. i never say RBI sue a foreign firm for accepting Indian clients although all of them (yes including those regulated in the US) do – explain this please?

    December 5th, 2011 at 3:12 pm
  26. Michael Greenberg said:

    just paste some of the content here :)

    December 5th, 2011 at 3:13 pm
  27. Stephen Leahy said:

    I do not personally agree with the CFTC rules and regs, but Carsten is correct. The CFTC can come after a non-US firm that is accepting US clients. How? The CFTC files it’s cases in US District Courts and occasionally in Federal courts. The CFTC would file and get a judgement against the non-US firm. At that point, technically, an agency of the US Federal Gov’t has a judgement against the non-US broker. If and when the US Federal Government decides to enforce the judgement, the Feds contact their counterpoints in the country of the foreign broker and ask that court system to enforce the judgement. It is a huge legal mess that ties up a broker’s time and money. Alternatively the US Feds go to the regulator and ask them to enforce the judgement. In general, the US Feds have too much time and money and too many lawyers. Once they decide a foreign broker violated rules, the US Feds eventually get their way.

    December 5th, 2011 at 3:30 pm
  28. Michael Greenberg said:

    basically you are saying it’s not fair but enforceable ;) i agree

    December 5th, 2011 at 3:34 pm
  29. James said:

    M G

    It’s not only CFTC, I read this on your Oct 10th post: “Capital Markets Board of Turkey threatens to sue 32 forex websites”.

    I believe they referenced as many firms as they could find offering a forex site that has Turkish as a language option and deemed it as a form of solicitation.

    December 5th, 2011 at 4:02 pm
  30. Michael Greenberg said:

    yep, they all threat but don’t pursue unless broker is located in their countries. only cftc pursues its laws on completely foreign entities…

    December 5th, 2011 at 4:05 pm
  31. Ron Finberg said:

    On a seperate issue that has nothing to do specifically with Forex – One of the reasons that the US does keep its vigilance in enforcing its jurisdiction to non-US firms is due to money laundering and tax evasion.

    After working with regulated and non regulated companies in the past, it is amazing how ignorant (whether purposely or not) unregulated firms are to potential money laundering red flags.

    Nonetheless, it would be nice to see some sort of cross atlantic cooperation between foreign regulators that would allow the European/UK regulated firms to receive US clients and vice versa.

    December 5th, 2011 at 6:07 pm
  32. Jagui said:

    If you look at all the forex brokers sued by the CFTC for not conforming with their rules with american citizens, you will discover that all those sued brokers have at least one point of presence in the USA. This point of presence can be an office, a telefone number, a hosted server, a registered address, a po box, and more… but there must be one, otherwise CFTC cannot sue the broker.
    This is a critical point only a few people understand.

    Please look at the list of sued brokers and do your research, you’ll discover that ALL sued brokers have at least one point of presence in the US.

    December 5th, 2011 at 6:14 pm
  33. Michael Greenberg said:

    that’s just the thing – it seems that the long term plan is to bring all american traders home and then shift them back to trading futures instead of forex

    December 6th, 2011 at 3:43 am
  34. Michael Greenberg said:

    a telephone number or registered address is not a point of presence as they can be virtual, it’s a pretense for CFTC to take action
    another risk is risk for owners/directors when they visit US

    December 6th, 2011 at 3:44 am
  35. From finland said:

    Hi, iam from finland, Jani hjerppe can you tell you WinCapita/ponzi
    backround??

    December 10th, 2011 at 3:26 pm
  36. Columbo said:
    December 12th, 2011 at 1:13 pm

We do not store your information and we do not disclose our sources.


Leave your name/email (not required) if you'd like to be contacted about this story (will not be disclosed):



Mirror Trader

Bitcoin

Executive Moves

Startups & New products

Question_Mark_by_norbert79

What in the World are Bitcoins? Part 2: Security & Satoshi

In Part Two of 'What in the World are Bitcoins' we take a look at security, wallet types, 51% attacks, DDoS, and who is mystery...

btc.uy

Living in the Future Today: BTC Global & BTC.UY

For BTC Global, bitcoins aren’t viewed as a new currency, but the technology of the future. In their world, digital currencies are swapped, goods are...

eToro Hosts First Israeli Bitcoin Hackathon

The first Israelie Bitcoin hackathon to be held later this month gets an interesting venue, as the event will be held at the Israel offices...

More Bitcoins

FM Platform

Sneak Peak: Joel Kruger Launching First Macro

Sneak peak at Currency Strategist turned trader, Joel Kruger's startup and Trading Platform First Macro. First Macro is an FX trading platform that combines...

jason

Jason Gibson Joins Tradenext as Head of Trading

FCA regulated forex broker Tradenext appoints Jason Gibson as Head of Trading, a senior management position in which Mr Gibson will be responsible for the...

http://forexmagnates.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/owen-thomas.png

Saxo Bank Launches Saxo TV – Hires Anchorman Owen Thomas

Saxo Bank has announced today the launch of Saxo TV. Led by former Bloomberg News Anchor Owen Thomas, Saxo TV will be providing on-demand trading...

More Executive Moves

New Product Spotlight

FM PlatformSneak Peak First Macro

Sneak Peak: Joel Kruger Launching First Macro

Sneak peak at Currency Strategist turned trader, Joel Kruger’s startup and Trading Platform First Macro. First Macro is an FX trading platform that combines technical and fundamental analysis and trading functionality within one interface.
Read more

Question_Mark_by_norbert79

What in the World are Bitcoins? Part 2: Security & Satoshi

In Part Two of ‘What in the World are Bitcoins’ we take a look at security, wallet types, 51% attacks, DDoS, and who is mystery creator Satoshi Nakamoto. Spoiler alert! We don’t have a clue who he is either.
Read more

More Startups & New Products

Forex Research

Recently Viewed Directory Profiles

Recent Comments

Note: Copyright © 2013 Forex Magnates. All rights reserved.

All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of Forex Magnates. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer. Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you.Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at Forex Magnates are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Forex Magnates or its management. Forex Magnates has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by Forex Magnates, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. Forex Magnates will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2012 "Forex Magnates Inc. - Home of the Forex Elite" All Rights Reserved.